Category: learning

in a foreign land

wonderfulexchange6 Comments

When I lived in Glasgow the hunt for children’s resources, or guarded optimism, or even (once) a rain storm would occasionally drive me through the glossy glass doors of Wesley Owen. This was usually a frustrating experience. They wouldn’t have what I wanted. They would try hard to sell me things I didn’t want. And everywhere, there was the burble of eager young Christians being nice to each other. I feel somewhat guilty about this, but I have to confess: I always found it oppressive. After 15 minutes of being bombarded with niceness, I had to flee — grabbing whatever books I hadn’t had time to realise I didn’t want.

But one day, it was quiet, and I lingered a bit longer. I stayed long enough to look at what I though was a lovely new display of filofaxes — better and brighter than any I’d seen. To match any mood, any set of vestments, any handbag. But on closer inspection, I found they were not filofaxes, but bibles — of a sort. Row after row of beautifully bound books called The Message — a bible paraphrase that has been wildly successful in some circles.

Another confession: I haven’t actually read The Message yet. I have meant to. So many people have found it a helpful tool, and so many people are buying it in place of more formal translations, that I suspect it would be worth asking why.

So I was totally caught off guard when I read a version of the 73rd psalm on Gadgetvicar’s blog today. Take a look at it. Then read the 73rd psalm in the NRSV.

What do you think?

Is the version in The Message helpful? Shocking? Inaccurate? Refreshing?

And those of you who know more about this than I do: can any one comment on how people actually use The Message? Is it a ‘starter bible’ — with the idea that the paraphrase is read alongside other translations later. Or is there a whole new generation of Christians out there who think of The Message as their bible in the same way that so many think that it’s King James or nothing? And if so, how will it shape the church?

demanding digressions

wonderfulexchange12 Comments

St Paul’s met for the third of the Lenten series on Liturgy today: a ludicrously quick look at the early development of the eucharist, followed by a consideration of the Liturgy of the Word (used loosely to mean everything before the offertory).

Simple, right?

But along the way, questions arose that took us into the history of baptismal practice, the development of priests (as opposed to bishops and deacons), Reformation and 20th Century liturgical change, and a discussion on the word ‘debts’ as it related both to parables and to various theories of atonement.

There are many people who would claim that priests don’t need to have theology degrees (though bizarrely, they are often the same people who tell you that lay people and ordinands need to get qualifications from Bangor). I am sure not all priests need degrees. But I fear more need them than are getting them.

And I really can’t see how one can run Lent courses without.

feminism 101

wonderfulexchange17 Comments

I’ve just returned from diocesan synod, where there was much conversation about the need to share resources and expertise more widely.  So to that end– to the glory of God, and for the Diocese of Argyll and the Isles– a short introduction to feminism:

  1. ‘Man’  is not an inclusive term, not even when used by a woman.
  2. Yes, it does matter.
  3. Feminism is nothing more than the consistent application of the idea that all human beings are of equal worth.
  4. If the church had been better at listening to Jesus, Mary Daly wouldn’t have had to shout so loudly.