brooding spirit

 

pentecost ferry

On Easter Day, the ferry home from Rothesay was enlivened by the antics of a dove preening on the rails. Since then she has been a regular passenger and was last seen trying to roost in a coil of rope. I was rather hoping that by Pentecost there would be a flutter of wings sheltering a new brood. But clearly this dove is in Advent: not yet, not yet.

pentecost

agent provocateur

Tomorrow is Pentecost, so my mind is filled with rushing wind and dancing flame and thoughts about the flow of energy — God’s and ours. But the wind stirred an old memory, an old conversation that I need to discharge here, lest it get in the way of the sermon.

(and there is a trick about preparing sermons — you must first get rid of all the preachable thoughts you don’t intend to use…)

The conversation took place years ago, in my first year at university. I have no idea what led to it or what it was about, but it began something like this:

‘What about passion then? Do you think it can be good? Or is it always dangerous?’

There were three of us in the room, with certain predictable roles.

The questioner was expert and guide, agent provocateur.

I was Miss Manners — the one with a rather prissy sense of New England propriety and decorum. The sort that spends hours embroidering large red A’s for the Hester Prynne’s of the world.

And the third often tried to make Hester Prynne look like a shrinking violet.

Given the casting, I knew what we were each supposed to say. But I was equally sure I had no idea what I thought. Passion just wasn’t part of Miss Manners’ curriculum. Not a category of thought ready to be discussed.

So seventeen years later, I find the answer pressing its way into a sermon.

Passion is often good. And always dangerous.

Though it is even more dangerous in its absence.

Let us hope it blows in on the wind.

Addendum: if any of you don’t know Hester Prynne,
stop now, turn off your computer, and go read
The Scarlet Letter. Right now. Today. Indeed, let’s make it required reading for all Anglicans by Lambeth 2008. That should help sort out the debate.

bed time

I have just returned from a nicely varied day. A wedding rehearsal this morning on an island not my own. An attempt at a ‘getting to know you meeting’ with someone who in the end did not have time. Then a long journey from Largs to Glagow, doubled by a slow burning VW van (circa 1967) blocking the road. A meeting in Glasgow (one of the enjoyable sort, where one actually feels one is doing what one is called to), then dinner with a friend.

On the way home, I knew I would miss the 9pm ferry, so stopped at Tescos, where there were hundreds of young children and infants looking pale and exhausted. When I commented to the woman on the till, she said, ‘Oh, it’s early yet. There’ll be children here till my shift finishes at 11.30.’

The self-righteous, dogmatic school teacher in me arose to lament the loss of bed time. I never had a bed time, mind, but there is a significant difference between being alowed to fall asleep randomly after an eveing at home, and being taken on chores at all hours.

So many children in perfectly ‘normal’ and ‘good’ homes suffer damage each day by the very routines we put them through — and by the constant low-level stress of trying to do more than is possible or wise. It is one of the things that nags at me and I wish we could better address as a church. But would anyone pause long enough to listen?

not all welcome

There is the rather sad news today that the Archbishop of Canterbury has chosen not to invite all bishops to the next Lambeth conference — at least not yet.

The Anglican Communion Office is being cagey: only ‘the first’ 800 invitations have been sent; the archbishop reserves the right to withhold or withdraw an invitation to any bishop ‘whose appointment, actions or manner of life have caused exceptionally serious division or scandal within the Communion’; and it seems there are a few invitations which may or may not be forthcoming, depending on what advice +Williams receives.

I cannot see how this helps anyone.

We say that the only way forward is to listen and respect each other as we seek a common mind, or learn to live with difference. But if the most controversial voices are silenced, there can be no honest conversation.

I do not envy any bishop who must choose whether to accept an invitation to Lambeth knowing that some of his or her colleagues have been excluded.

I do not know how we can proclaim good news to the poor, the oppressed and the marginalized if we are willing to marginalize our own.

+Williams’ task is almost impossible. There is much that I respect in him as a person, as a theologian and as an archbishop. But I think he has got this one wrong.

New York Times article

A Statement from Gene Robinson

Comments from The Living Church on Martin Minns

Thinking Anglicans Links
(includes Anglican Communion Statements)