through the cracks

My day off flipped around this week, so off I went to Edinburgh to see some friends.

It was a good day, catching up on news, sharing stories, pondering the demise of hobbies and the meta-congnitive functions revealed in the ordering of bookshelves.

I have been blessed with more than my share of good friends over the years — many of whom put up with dreadful neglect and know to measure patterns of contact in years, not days.  But forming ‘new’ friendships is a tricky thing in a priest’s life.  We are never really off duty.  We are never not-a-priest and never wholly free to form friendships with those for whom we are ‘priest’.

So how is it that these two slipped under the cracks, I wonder?

I’ve known others to go through a ‘category shift’ (from ‘parishioner’ to ‘friend’ when our geography changed) but these two just landed in the ‘friends’ list as if by chance.

And although I forget all about the usual distinctions when I am with them, I am sure that the me I find when I am with them is the one who was first called and ordained.

I am grateful for it.

 

elsewhere

My web time has been used up elsewhere today, but this is to let all you Hermione’s out there know that this week’s challenge is up.

The web is a strange and glorious thing.  For many of us, the experience of watching the Inauguration was changed by the ability to watch and ‘chat’ in facebook at the same time.  There was something wonderful about being able to watch, knowing that all your friends were watching too.  The result seems to be that Facebook is growing by leaps and bounds — in my world at least.  People I’ve not spoken to for decades have sent me friend requests.   Suddenly, I’m seeing photos of people I have never seen as adults, and remembering the taste of a chocolate cake I haven’t had for 20 years.  I had forgotten how much more diverse my world was before moving to Britain.  One gets used to ‘sameness’ and forgets.   I am glad that my world has suddenly expanded (again) to include friends with dreadlocks, liberal baptists, those who engineer the dreams of Disney, and concert pianists.   Did I really know I was giving all that up when I set out for St Andrews?

(still, there have been other things to make up for it; not least God and decent cups of tea.)

new plan

I’ve just been reading Kate’s most recent post for the fourth or fifth time.   The image of domestic bliss and the faint whiff of cinnamon keep drawing me back.

So, I have a plan.

Forget bloggers and bluebells.  This year’s party is going to be a day of cookie making.  Not sure when yet.  Girls (and honorary others) —  are you willing?

whose or who?

As I drove home from Rothesay tonight, I was listening to the static on Radio 4, which was occasionally interrupted by Front Row. In one such interruption, a play was being reviewed: promising premise, stunning cast, but not quite what the reviewer had hoped for. When asked where it went wrong she said: ‘there’s a fabulous cast of characters, but at some point as a writer, you need to look at that and say “whose story am I going to tell?” You have to know what everything else revolves around.’

(apologies if this is not what she said. It is what I heard.)

And as soon as I heard it, I knew there was something there for me; something I needed to hear.

I haven’t been blogging much lately precisely because I haven’t known whose story to tell.

A priest’s life is highly populated with stories. The stories of scripture, the stories of the congregations, the stories of each member of the congregations. Stories of friends. Stories of mentors. Stories of our own lives; stories we hide from.

So whose story do you tell?

When I first heard the comment on Front Row, I went into ‘priest mode’ (call me on heresy later. This post is not on theology). I began mentally drafting a post on the theme ‘the story we tell is Christ’s.’

And that is true. But it is too easy.

So, the next imaginary post was: ‘to tell Christ’s story you need first to be able to tell your own.’

And that is true too. But it still misses the mark somehow. It leaves the door too wide on self-limiting stories, self-fabricated stories that don’t really lead us any further into Christ.

So, I began to wonder: what if it’s not ‘whose story do I tell’ but ‘who do I tell’?

Three times in the past two months I have been with people who know me so well that there is no need for story. There is no need to give context, or build defences. No need to tidy things up.

Those people leave me free to speak the things I find hard to admit. They help me feel the things I hadn’t even realized were there to feel. And only a few things need to be spoken for much to be understood.

Right now I can’t tell my story, because my head is full of theirs. Or rather of ours. Of 20, 25 years of friendship which is finally stripped of pretence and has emerged as something true.

So maybe that is Christ’s story after all.

You three, who should know who you are: Thank you.